> After reading the CG stuff, If you feel any info should be brought > over to the users manual, post a patch and we can discuss it. And, > of course, if after reading the CG stuff is still unclear on how > they work, lemme know.
OK, I've read it, and the concept of purity is explained well, thanks. However, it's still not clear to me why the example works. . First of all, `make-XXX-stencil' seems to be completely undocumented. At least I can't find those functions in the reference (except some unsystematic usage here and there). . I would expect that both `make-circle-stencil' and `make-filled-box-stencil' produce something which has a natural height. Apparently, this isn't true. Why? This should be mentioned, otherwise the example is not really comprehensible IMHO. . Even if `make-XXX-stencil' produce objects with zero height, I don't understand why the layout engine ignores it. IMHO, zero height is not the same as an empty stencil. Maybe there is something else which I don't understand... Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user