On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote: > More generally than that, I think the reason to discuss is to _discover_ the > areas where you can cooperate. There are obvious areas of interaction -- > e.g. enabling Lilypond output for MuseScore and ensuring that it gets > updated effectively in response to Lilypond syntax changes.
I have considered using Lilypond as a back end for front end hacking, but the compile time from .ly to .svg is way too high. Is it architecturally possible to make a significant amount of overhead go away? Are incremental compiles plausible? _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
