On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
<joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
> More generally than that, I think the reason to discuss is to _discover_ the
> areas where you can cooperate.  There are obvious areas of interaction --
> e.g. enabling Lilypond output for MuseScore and ensuring that it gets
> updated effectively in response to Lilypond syntax changes.

I have considered using Lilypond as a back end for front end hacking,
but the compile time from .ly to .svg is way too high.

Is it architecturally possible to make a significant amount of
overhead go away? Are incremental compiles plausible?

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to