On 10/06/12 08:14, David Kastrup wrote:
The discussion is not useful. It distracts from work needing to get done, without offering perspectives that are actually feasible since they are neither thought through nor have the resources for tackling them _if_ they made sense and were planned out.
Fair enough. I'm happy to respond to any of the technical queries you've raised, if that would ever become relevant in future, but I'll bow out here.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
