On 03/06/12 17:44, David Kastrup wrote:
I don't want to remove "as much C++ as possible". That's about as useful as to remove "as much C as possible" from Emacs. The point is to consider C++ as the building language for primitives, and tie together the primitives in Scheme.
OK, I misinterpreted your remarks somewhat. I had read them as meaning that (besides re-architecting things so that control flow etc. was organized from within Scheme) you wanted to strip out the object-oriented side of things and move that over to Scheme, so that what was currently C++ would be pared back to being fairly pure C.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
