On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Jeff Barnes <jbarnesweb > If the use of the fonts were covered by LilyPond's license, that would pretty > much > kill using LilyPond for anything at a publishing house, wouldn't it?
There's something called "font exception" which says that having LilyPond's font in the engraving doesn't make this engraving GPL-ed. > Does distributing a pdf of Lily's output potentially mean you have to make > Lily's source, > the .ly file, or any other artifact the user created using Lily available > under GPL? of course not. LilyPond is a tool; using a tool to produce something doesn't mean that the created thing is a derivative of the tool. Music produced using LilyPond is not a "LilyPond derivative work". In short: don't worry. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
