Jan-Peter Voigt <jp.vo...@gmx.de> writes: >>> So AFAICS there are at least 3 different ways to create a module to >>> use in a header: >>> 1: (eval-string "(define-module (a b))") >> What's with the eval-string nonsense? Why don't you just use >> (define-module (a b)) instead? > because: "define-module can only be used at the top level"
Ugh. Still (primitive-eval '(define-module (a b))) would be nicer since you at least don't need the Scheme reader at runtime. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
