2012/2/8 Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu>: > Guidelines for the preservation grant (which will probably be due in July) > are shown here: > http://www.neh.gov/grants/guidelines/HCRR.html > > Guidelines for the digital humanities grants are shown here: > http://www.neh.gov/grants/guidelines/digitalhumanitiesstartup.html
They both seem related to our work indeed. > B) Development of a lilypond scoring standard for the project, so that > scholars would know how to compare scores. Do you mean creating a standard lily code formatting style? > C) Development of score_ocr2ly, which would take a score pdf and turn it > into .ly files matching the lilypond scoring standard From the user's perspective, this is extremely cool. From contributor's perspective, i have no idea what kind of task is this. i think that doing GLISS would be important if we wanted Lily to be used in big libraries. I'm keen to work on GLISS. > So I'd like to ask the developers (and the users): Does this seem > interesting to you? Is this something that is worth trying to put > together? I'm interested, both as a user and as a contributor. > Is anybody interested in contributing to a grant proposal? You mean writing it? I have 0 experience writing formal papers like this. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
