Hi Carl, 2012/2/3 Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu>: > > > On 2/2/12 11:54 AM, "Thomas Morley" <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>Hi Brent, >> >>2012/2/2 Brent Annable <brentanna...@gmail.com>: >>> Perhaps this is impertinent of me, but I would suggest the following >>> phrasing: >>> >>> "A LaissezVibrer tie can be used to tie a note from the end of the first >>> repeat back to the start of the repeated section. The length of the tie >>>can >>> be tweaked using LSR-snippet 715 as shown." >> >>not at all. >> >>I changed it to your suggestion. > > We won't want the reference to LSR snippet 715 in the docs, and I don't > think we are going to want to maintain a linkage between the two, so I > think that we should not have the reference to 715 in the descriptive text. > > I'd prefer "A LaissezVibrer tie can be used to tie.... The length of the > tie can be tweaked. > > Thanks, > > Carl > >
I changed as you proposed. But I let the code of 715 in the code of the new snippet. Shall I use another tweaking.method? But may I ask: what's the problem with 715? Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
