Hi Harm, On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com > wrote:
this is great !! And I was not a little but a big blockhead.;) > Hah, no... I'm just a fresh pair of eyes :) Speaking of which, looking with fresh eyes at the file I just attached, I really should have condensed that list of nearly identical offset calculations. (See attached for the way I came up with.) > The results look fine to me, except for the arpeggio of course. I don't > > know what the problem is here. > > The arpeggio seems to belong to the NoteColumn (with "2.15.x"), > although the IR speaks only about Stems and NoteHeads . This means > that a chord with an arpeggio has a bigger extent (and length) and is > selected when passing the condition of dir-correction as being greater > than one-note-head-length. > It's of course possible to change the condition, but I'm not sure, > perhaps it's a bug. Did you notice > > http://old.nabble.com/bug-or-feature-with-the-extent-of-NoteColumn-with-%222.15.20%22---td32935365.html > where I ask about it (so far without answer)? > > Yes, I saw your thread and I'd be interested in hearing the answer too. I just tried the file with 2.14.2, and the arpeggio works perfectly there. > Many, many thanks!! > You're quite welcome! -David
center-note-column-11.ly
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
