Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>
> On 24 July 2011 17:14, -Eluze <elu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> nope! it's because i merged it into one staff - if i merge it into one
>> voice
>> it works:
>>
>> voiceA = { \slurUp e'( d')}
>> voiceB = { \tieUp c'~ c' }
>> voiceC = { a ~ a }
>>
>> \new Voice <<
>> \voiceA
>> \voiceB
>> \voiceC
>> >>
>>
>
> Nope. It works this time because you do not have contrary commands
> ( \tieUp and \tieDown ) merged into the same _voice_.
> At least that's what I think!
>
i must admit - the last "command" seen wins! P-(:-{
so let's go back to more relevant topics!
cheers
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/where%27s-the-slur--%284-year-old-question%29-tp32122228p32126368.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
