Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:14:48AM +0200, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote: >> On Thu 17 Mar 2011, 18:08 Kieren MacMillan wrote: >> > Unfortunately, "lower barrier of entry" almost always means "more crap to >> > sift through". >> The more crap -- the lower criteria barrier for "what is `crap'?". >> The more crap will become "normal" and even "good thing". > > Has that happened with books? Have stories become total crap over > the past 10/50/200 years?
The average Usenet flame is less edifying to read than, say, Old French fabliaux, or equivalent verbiage like "The Miller's Tale" in Chaucer's "Canterbury Tales". Mind you, those _are_ actually examples for unbelievably crude trash. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
