On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:58:15PM +0000, Neil Puttock wrote: > On 14 January 2011 21:04, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > Sometimes I am inclined to just commit and be done. After all, this > > would just omit a warning in working cases, and would fix the totally > > broken warning message when breves and longas get into play. Of course, > > this latter part would require translations of the fixed message to be > > placed in the message catalogs. > > It looks fine to me, apart from a whitespace nitpick. The only thing > missing is a regtest.
Why a regtest? I mean, would what it check...? would it just be verifying that lilypond doesn't print a message in this particular case? At the moment we don't have a (good) infrastructure for such regtests, but I hope to get that into play after 2.15. I really think a regtest is overkill; I suggest fixing the whitespace and then pushing it. > BTW, where's the original thread? I can't seem to find it in my email > history. This thread started on -user, so if you don't read that list (or if you read it with a different email address), you wouldn't have that email. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
