2010/12/30 Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net>:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sven Axelsson" <sven.axels...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Aha, perfect! This has been most fortunate. I have posed these
>> questions to the list previously, but couldn't get any good answers
>> then. Now both my remaining problems with achieving perfect bagpipe
>> notation have been adressed. Happy, happy, joy, joy!
>
> A snippet for the LSR demonstrating how to typeset perfect bagpipe music
> would be most appreciated.

Will do. Since I am the original author of the bagpipe.ly mode
included in the standard Lilypond distribution, I guess I really ought
to see if I can get my new tweaks approved and included.

The problem with that is that I've been tweaking things for quite some
time and the new and improved bagpipe.ly I'm using now is not backward
compatible. Which means I should add convert-ly rules as well.

-- 
Sven Axelsson
++++++++++[>++++++++++>+++++++++++>++++++++++>++++++
>++++<<<<<-]>++++.+.++++.>+++++.>+.<<-.>>+.>++++.<<.
+++.>-.<<++.>>----.<++.>>>++++++.<<<<.>>++++.<----.

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to