On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 12:54:39PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: > I think it's fine the way it is now. Perhaps I wouldn't place Denemo > above LilyPondTool, although it does make sense to regroup LPT with > Frescobaldi. > > (Actually, what I *would* do is emphasize LPT, perhaps with a big > [RECOMMENDED] sign.)
Why not recommend Frescobaldi? I'm not comfortable placing a semi-official seal of approval on either one at the expense of the other. > Now that I'm looking again at these pages, the pseudo-Windows logo > doesn't strike me as self-explanatory (besides its specific touch of > ugliness). Would you be ready to consider using a different one, such > as > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Image-Vista_Like_logo.png > or > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Windows.svg > or > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Win-like-userbox.svg > ? Hmm. I've never used xp or vista, so I'm not so familiar with the pastel colors. I have no real objection to changing, though. ... wait a moment, isn't Windows.svg the same as what we already have? ... oh, ok, the current one has thick black borders. *shrug* I'll accept a patch for this. You'll want to update the png file and the copyright info in whichever macro file I put it in (can't remember). > > When he began working, he had one opinion and I had the other. > > But over the past four months, we've switched positions like a > > finely-honed comedy act -- we still disagree, but we've both taken > > up the other person's initial position. > > Wait - so you're saying you *can* change your mind at times? :-) If it makes things awkward and delays an aspect of website work for 4 months, sure! Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
