One solution would be ask if the new user have experience in this respect? So it will be redirect to one of two different pages: one for each case.
On 7 May 2010 12:18, Bernardo Barros <bernardobarr...@gmail.com> wrote: > For a user inexperienced new Lilypond user in programming (deal with > text and editors) I think he/she should make contact as fast as > possible with something like LilyPondTool. In this respect I think > this way should be as easy as possible for this type of new user. > Later he/she can choose a different method, but it's not likely that > he/she will stick with Lilypond if things become to uncommon in a > first moment. It's nice because it facilitate some common troubles for > new-users and it run on all platforms. I'm not saying it's the "best" > editor, but it's the best one for a first experience with Lilypond, in > my opinion. I like Emacs, I'm waiting to see more functionalities in > Emacs/lilypond-mode (maybe someone is doing extensions to > lilypond-mode right now???), but JEdit/Lilypond is running faster, I > think. > > On 7 May 2010 11:13, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: >> The argument for #2: it doesn't make sense to have algorithmic >> programming environments like Strasheela and FOMUS in the same >> list as Denemo, Frescobaldi, and LilyPondTool; having the extra >> options will only confused newbies; if we keep 4 or 5 >> "highlighted" programs in this list and move the rest somewhere >> else, it won't be much harder to maintain the list; etc. >> >> >> I'm not particularly looking for votes on this issue -- rather, >> I'm looking for reasons for (or against) #1 and #2 that we haven't >> thought of. It would be great if somebody said "we should do #x >> because XYZ" and then have us go "of course! XYZ! That makes >> everything totally clear; we all agree due to XYZ." >> > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
