I've been chided before about still using 2.6.5, and I still find that I learn
more and more, and feel satisfied with what I do with it...but it nags me I'm
so far behind the discussion on this list.
My biggest con against upgrading is I don't have the time to upgrade 30 or more
pieces (not to mention test/templates). The biggest pro is that I'm having to
do this already as I learn how to do better with 2.6.5 I am starting to revisit
old files...and reduce the size of my final output PDF from 14 pages to 6...it
takes time to rework the old files. Possibly the same time it would take to
get used to a new version and revise the old files?
So - is it possible to run the old (2.6.5) and the newest stable branch (a 2.12
version I think?) simultaneously on a WinXP box? Or do I have to try and use
my laptop (Win7 machine) for the new (or old versions), and just struggle using
both machines (I really don't like to use my laptop...)? I imagine that a lot
of my music notation (the actual notes and durations and rests and beamings)
can be copied over to a newer version, but my techniques in using score and
contexts might need updating?
Well, I'm actually facing that now with 2.6.5 - as I had been warned (year or
so ago?) by Mats - as it's hard to get/find advice, and seeing that 2.10 had
the issue simplified...and I wonder, do I want to chase down the code fix for
how I'm writing now in 2.6.5 or do I try to make the big leap?
And if the answer is to go stepwise through 2.8 - 2.10 - then 2.12 then I have
to say "sorry boys, I'm staying in the paleozoic!" I just don't have the time
to do that...
I would appreciate any advice - suggestions. Thanks!
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/210850552/direct/01/_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
