Dear David,
thank You for Your reply.
I will do, as You've suggested.
2010/3/1 David Bobroff <bobr...@centrum.is>
> Stefan,
>
> For this particular snippet I would normally expect to see simply; +○ with
> no dash or dashed line between the + and ○. For such a sort note this would
> be perfectly clear. For a longer note that gradually opens/closes such a
> dashed line would be fine, but I would also probably expect to see it done
> using at least two notes tied together; one note with + and the other with ○
> with the dashed line between. In the case of repeated open/close across
> several notes a dashed line would also be clear. For single notes, however,
> it would normally be sufficient to use simply +○ or ○+ as the "wah" effect
> is usually spread out across the duration of the note.
>
> -David
>
>
> On 3/1/2010 8:44 AM, Stefan Thomas wrote:
>
> Dear community,
> I made a second attempt to create a symbol for the so called
> wah-wah-effect.
> My first question:
> Would You think, this is the common way to notate it?
> My second question:
> I would like to make the textspanner longer, but this, unfortunately,
> doesn't work.
> Here is my snippet:
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%% BEGIN %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> \version "2.12.2"
>
> wah = {
> \override Voice.TextSpanner #'shorten-pair = #'(0 . -8) %this doesn't do
> anything, why?
> \override Voice.TextSpanner #'style = #'dashed-line
> \override Voice.TextSpanner #'(bound-details left text) = \markup {
> \musicglyph #"scripts.stopped" }
> \override Voice.TextSpanner #'(bound-details right text) =
> \markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.open" }
> } %
> harmonmute = ^\markup { \whiteout "harmon mute" }
> music = {
> \time 2/4 \wah
> \clef "treble" f''16 \harmonmute ( -> \mf [ es''16 ) r16 b'16 -. ]
> r16 des''16 -. [ r16 as'16
> ( ~ -> ] as'16 [ ges'16 ) -. \context Voice << {c''16 -> -. \sfz ]}
> {s16 \startTextSpan }>> r16\stopTextSpan r4
> }
> \new Staff \music
> %%%%%%%%% END %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> 2009/12/27 bobr...@centrum.is <bobr...@centrum.is>
>
>> Ah, you want a dashed hairpin. Is this to notate a gradual
>> opening/closing? I would not normally expect to see a dashed hairpin but
>> rather simply a dashed line between the '+' and 'o'. This means gradual
>> open/close. It seems that you want something like 'o > +' or '+ < o',
>> correct? I suppose you could mark one note with '+' and another with 'o'
>> and place your hairpin between. Again, however, as a trombonist I would
>> find this notation non-standard and potentially confusing. I don't know
>> enough about your notation requirements to understand why you would want or
>> need to notate it this way.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stefan Thomas" <kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com>
>> To: bobr...@centrum.is
>> Cc: "lilypond-user" <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 12:13:19 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: Re: wah-wah-effect
>>
>> Dear David,
>> thanks for Your help.
>> I found out, that I can get a dashed hairpin with \once \override Hairpin
>> #'style = #'dashed-line
>> What I would like to do is getting a + and an "o" at the beginning and the
>> end of the hairpin.
>> The "o" is easy to get with
>> \override Hairpin #'circled-tip = ##t
>>
>> But how I can do it with the "+"-sign?
>> 2009/12/27 bobr...@centrum.is < bobr...@centrum.is >
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure exactly how you want your wah-wah effect to appear, but for
>> starters you can go here:
>>
>>
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/the-feta-font#index-Feta-font
>>
>> ...to find the glyphs you need. The ones you need are listed under "Script
>> glyphs." One is "stopped" (looks like '+') and the other is "flageolet"
>> (looks like a small circle). There is also "open" which looks like a small
>> letter 'o'. I've normally seen the little circle (I'm a trombonist). I don't
>> know how to do this without experimenting with it but if you want '+O' I
>> suppose you could create a script called 'wah' or something and combine them
>> together side-by-side. This would mean 'wah' on a single note. If you wanted
>> the effect to span two or more notes I think you should be able to put the
>> '+' over one note, the 'o' over the other and put some sort of dotted/dashed
>> spanner between them.
>>
>> Sorry I can't be more specific at the moment but I hope this is helpful,
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stefan Thomas" < kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com >
>> To: "lilypond-user" < lilypond-user@gnu.org >
>> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 5:51:19 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: Re: wah-wah-effect
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear community,
>> I've created a little image (with another program) to illustrate what I'm
>> thinking of.
>>
>>
>> 2009/12/27 Stefan Thomas < kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com >
>>
>>
>> Dear lilypond-users,
>> does someone of You know, how to produce a proper notation for wah-wah
>> effect for trumpet or trombone?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>> lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
