Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
>
> Replying to a week old post ... but I can't see any other replies ...
>
nice it did not just vanish…
> I note you're using \relative - make sure you know "relative to what".
>
\relative after a chord should just be relative to the first note in the
chord, shouldn't it!?
> And I don't know what bbare is doing ...
>
that's explained in the snippet.
> If you need some way of "fixing" things getting too high (and it doesn't
> look particularly appropriate here, unless you put "\bbarre #"III" { <f
> a'>16[ c' d c d 8] }" into a snippet variable) you might find the
> "resetOctave" function handy. It might have made its way into the docs,
> or you might have to search the list archive (it'll be in an ancient
> post by me or Han-Wen).
>
thanks, but i think it's easier to use a self-made textspanner if you can
not rely on a function that made it into the LSR and looked interesting -
to me and probably all guitar note writers.
since the LSR usually does not mention the contributor, it is difficult to
address him.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/wrong-relative-positions-in-snippet-632-when-calling-it-nrepeatedly-tp27135776p27217695.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
