Le mercredi 06 janvier 2010 à 23:04 +0100, Mats Bengtsson a écrit : > Quoting James Bailey <derhindem...@googlemail.com>: > > pdflatex always complains if I don't have it there > > That's weird! The graphicx package should automatically detect if you > are using pdflatex or latex and choose the appropriate driver.
Agreed. I can't remember if pdflatex issues any warning if I don't specify [pdftex], but it always produced correct output without this option (with TeXlive 2008 and 2009). James, which TeX distro do you use? > Explicitly specifying this option is a bad idea in general. Yes, and in particular it makes lilypond-book fails (see below the explanation). > (Note that > this has nothing to do with lilypond-book per se). It has actually something to do: lilypond-book calls latex on the preamble of the .lytex document in order to determine the line width (IIRC, and/or some paper-related metrics anyway), hence the failure of latex James reported in his first email if the input file extension is .lytex. To work around this, best is to remove [pdftex] option from the .lytex, but it might work to set lilypond-book command line option --latex-program=pdflatex. James, if you sum up the issues raised in this thread into one or two paragraphs, we'll consider adding them to a section 'Known issues and warnings' in lp-book docs. Best, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
