Hi Michael, > I am experimenting with methods to enter notes from a manuscript and produce > several typeset scores, including at least > • one that looks very much like the manuscript, for proof reading > • another that is good for performance. > There will probably be other versions too. > > Problem: the manuscript naturally has errors that need to be corrected for a > performance score, to say nothing of editorial changes that may do more than > correct errors. But I would like to make the production of performance scores > independent of the representation of the manuscript. Data entry from the > manuscript should not involve any musical correction; editing changes for a > performance score should not involve any change to the representation of the > manuscript (which has a lot of historical significance, as well as being the > source of the music). Corrections to note durations are particularly > troublesome. > > I can build scripts to edit a *.ly file, say with sed, but I'd rather stick > entirely to Lilypond and its tools. Any pointers?
Look into \tag. Cheers, Kieren. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
