2009/11/27 Alexander Kobel <n...@a-kobel.de>:
> But... it's nothing to do with \changePitch. Remove this command, and the
> result looks the same.
I disagree (see below). The reason why the rests "look strange" is
that the change Pitch gives them a different "pitch" and therefore
affects their vertical placement. Gilles, perhaps it might be worth
adding a filter to leave rests alone?
> Let's face it, \partcombine sucks. I quit using it long ago, since the
> trouble compared to writing a simple << {} {} >> and spacer rests in the
> second part is just not worth it, IMHO.
I'm not gonna add a new issue named "\partcombine sucks" -- we already
know it does :)
> Valentin, if you did not gave up on \partcombine yet, feel free to add
> another bug: \partcombine (also) sucks if the user tries to force it to deal
> with music extracts of different lengths.
Does it? The following snippet looks fine to me:
{
c'1
\partcombine { d' d' d' d' } { d' c' c' }
c'
}
Cheers,
Valentin
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
