On 14.08.2009, at 19:11, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 8/14/09 9:54 AM, "James E. Bailey" <derhindem...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
Though I reorganized them for 2.13. Hopefully you'll find this
version easier to read:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/notation/index_54.html
- Mark
Thank you, incidentally, after some trial and error (after I sent
the email) I
figured that out. Although I should point out, neither
documentation source
says that the glyph names for the numbers don't begin with "scripts".
The list of all glyphs says the numbers are "one", "two", etc. The
fermatas
are "scripts.ufermata", "scripts.dfermata", etc.
Where does this imply that the numbers should be "scripts.one", not
"one"?
How could we make the documentation clearer?
Thanks,
Carl
No problems, in the 2.12 documentation, b.6 The Feta font. The first
sentence there is:
The following symbols are available in the Emmentaler font and may be
accessed directly using text markup such as g^\markup { \musicglyph
#"scripts.segno" }, see Formatting text.
In the one on kainhofer it's section a.6 The Feta font:
The following symbols are available in the Emmentaler font and may be
accessed directly using text markup such as g^\markup { \musicglyph
#"scripts.segno" }, see Formatting text.
James E. Bailey
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
