On 8/14/09 9:54 AM, "James E. Bailey" <derhindem...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Though I reorganized them for 2.13. Hopefully you'll find this
>> version easier to read:
>> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/notation/index_54.html
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>>
>
> Thank you, incidentally, after some trial and error (after I sent the email) I
> figured that out. Although I should point out, neither documentation source
> says that the glyph names for the numbers don't begin with "scripts".
>
The list of all glyphs says the numbers are "one", "two", etc. The fermatas
are "scripts.ufermata", "scripts.dfermata", etc.
Where does this imply that the numbers should be "scripts.one", not "one"?
How could we make the documentation clearer?
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
