2009/4/29 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>:
2009/4/29 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>:
> Yes and no. It would be a great strategy, if we had any clue what
> the status of LSR was. Until we have some kind of indication as
> to when the change can happen, and how it should happen, I
> question whether any of this work is worthwhile.
> Valentin, what's the latest?
No news from Seba. Of course, we may install a temporary LSR on my
server (or Reinhold's).
> I'd say:
> 1) make LSR 2.12
> 2) tag snippets
> 3) add stuff from input/new/
> 4) go through each tag, checking for non-overlap with 2.12 NR,
> accuracy, compliance with doc policy, etc.
I agree with Mats, we should first improve convert-ly as much as we can.
> Is it worth defining our own function
> replaceOnly("\\octave", ...)
> which does
> re.sub("\\octave[?a-z,A-Z]", ...)
> or whatever the regex was?
An even more drastic way would be to redefine re.sub so we don't have
to search-and-replace through the whole script :-)
Regards,
Valentin
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
