2009/4/6 Trevor Daniels <t.dani...@treda.co.uk>: >> The 'q' version to my eyes is a bit easier to read. > > As I do little note entry myself I don't have a view > on the merits of q vs &, but there is another issue to > consider. If the base chord being repeated contains > tweaks, fingering, etc, are these to be repeated too?
That's an interesting question. I think it would be wiser to repeat only the notes (the only other thing that could have to be repeated would be staccato dots, for instance, but this can be handled through Scheme functions). Werner: on an AZERTY french keyboard, you don't need to press shift to type "&", that is why I proposed it in the first place :-) That being said, `q' for [kord] makes sense to me (though in a geeky way), so I withdraw my question :) Regards, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
