On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 22:15 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > 2008/8/12 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I would say that the second case should just be false. Unless 'me' is a > > staff symbol, you should not call Staff_symbol::on_line(me). And if 'me' > > is a staff symbol, it is not a staff symbol referencer, so no one should > > be calling Staff_symbol_referencer::on_line(me). > > Ah yes, I really do get it now. :) > > Just a quick question before I commit this: > Staff_symbol_referencer::on_line () is overloaded, but only on_line > (Grob *, int) is used; the same applies to > Staff_symbol_referencer::on_staff_line (). Can I junk the redundant > functions?
It's ok with me. Joe _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
