On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 22:15 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2008/8/12 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> > I would say that the second case should just be false. Unless 'me' is a
> > staff symbol, you should not call Staff_symbol::on_line(me). And if 'me'
> > is a staff symbol, it is not a staff symbol referencer, so no one should
> > be calling Staff_symbol_referencer::on_line(me).
> 
> Ah yes, I really do get it now. :)
> 
> Just a quick question before I commit this:
> Staff_symbol_referencer::on_line () is overloaded, but only on_line
> (Grob *, int) is used; the same applies to
> Staff_symbol_referencer::on_staff_line (). Can I junk the redundant
> functions?
It's ok with me.

Joe




_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to