-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 4. August 2008 schrieb Palmer, Ralph: > I'm working on indexing, and I have a question for those of us who use > the function index. > > When looking for a command such as \repeat or \alternative, which would > you find more helpful: having duplicate index entries (i.e., one with > the backslash and one without) or having an entry only for the exact > command? In other words, option 1 would have all of: > > \alternative > \repeat > alternative > repeat > > while option 2 would have only > > \alternative > \repeat
It depends where the \commands are sorted alphabetically. If "\alternative" is sorted in the position where "alternative" would appear, I'm fine with the second option. But if all backslashed commands are sorted into their own group, then I prefer the first one. Cheers, Reinhold - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/ * K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer * Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIlxtoTqjEwhXvPN0RAob1AKDZmWlBjuU09AI7EeHZo20smfZQMQCeOvgs lxmtn+jqS9MJvyxVq/hupAY= =Drm4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
