2008/8/4 Palmer, Ralph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi - > > I'm working on indexing, and I have a question for those of us who use > the function index. > > When looking for a command such as \repeat or \alternative, which would > you find more helpful: having duplicate index entries (i.e., one with > the backslash and one without) or having an entry only for the exact > command? In other words, option 1 would have all of: > > \alternative > \repeat > alternative > repeat > > while option 2 would have only > > \alternative > \repeat
For me, \alternative \repeat % as exact commands, and then alternatives, repeat repeats % as common notation words -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
