On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:04:06 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Hammar) wrote:
> Graham:
> > > << { \voiceOne ... } \new Voice { \voiceTwo ... } >> \oneVoice
> >
> > Is that really the "right" method? I thought that \\ *was* the
> > right method... in fact, isn't \\ exactly the same as what you
> > propose?
> ...
>
> No,
Huh, I had no idea.
Everybody: this is why your proofreading is so important. Some
doc writers have only been using lilypond for five months. I used
lilypond a few years ago, but there's huge swaths of material that I
don't know -- or even worse, material I *think* that I know, but I'm
actually incorrect.
If I'm the only person reviewing material that five-month newbies
are writing, the docs could end up misleading or even completely
incorrect.
Thanks, Mark and Karl. Hopefully Francisco and Trevor will modify
LM 3 / NR 1.5 to clarify/correct this point.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
