On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:04:06 +0200 (CEST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Hammar) wrote:
> Graham: > > > << { \voiceOne ... } \new Voice { \voiceTwo ... } >> \oneVoice > > > > Is that really the "right" method? I thought that \\ *was* the > > right method... in fact, isn't \\ exactly the same as what you > > propose? > ... > > No, Huh, I had no idea. Everybody: this is why your proofreading is so important. Some doc writers have only been using lilypond for five months. I used lilypond a few years ago, but there's huge swaths of material that I don't know -- or even worse, material I *think* that I know, but I'm actually incorrect. If I'm the only person reviewing material that five-month newbies are writing, the docs could end up misleading or even completely incorrect. Thanks, Mark and Karl. Hopefully Francisco and Trevor will modify LM 3 / NR 1.5 to clarify/correct this point. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user