Graham:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:03:07 +0100
> Mark Knoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Given the number of emails on this list about slur, tie, etc problems
> > arising from using the << { ... } \\ { ... } >> polyphony method,
> > would it perhaps be a good idea to at least include an example of the
> > "right" way to do it here?
> >
> > << { \voiceOne ... } \new Voice { \voiceTwo ... } >> \oneVoice
>
> Is that really the "right" method? I thought that \\ *was* the
> right method... in fact, isn't \\ exactly the same as what you
> propose?
...
No,
Ex1: << { \A } \\ { \B } >>
creates TWO new voices, which get you into problems when doing \lyricsto,
where
Ex2: << { \voiceOne \a } \new Voice { \voiceTwo \b } >> \oneVoice
only creates ONE new voice, \a "belongs" to the same voice as the surronding
music.
Ex1 is a dead end, nice for simple notes, everewhere else you have to do
Ex2.
Regards,
/Karl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
