It's not a matter of whether the actual analysis of a musical passage is right or wrong, the issue is whether or not the software can help us make the analytical symbols look better, clearer and more concise -- precisely what Lilypond is all about, if I am not mistaken -- without breaking too much of a sweat to do it.
- Jesse On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > luis jure wrote: >> El Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:29:02 -0400 >> Kieren MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: >> >>> heck, it's often extremely difficult to get two *humans* to agree on >>> the analysis of a given musical passage! >> >> you're right. that's why it would be a good idea to let the computers >> do the job... :-) > But that analysis software would be programmed by humans. :) > > Paul Scott >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> lilypond-user@gnu.org >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
