Joe Neeman escreveu:
> On Tuesday 21 August 2007 20:34, Valentin Villenave wrote:
>> That being said, do you think it would be a good idea to make
>> TimeSignature accept the break-alignable-interface?
>
> No, because TimeSignature already accepts an interface
> (break-aligned-interface) that determines its horizontal position; it
> wouldn't make sense for it to accept another one. The cleanest way of getting
> this functionality into the lilypond core, in my opinion, would be to create
> a whole new grob class.
I think you are all thinking in too complicated directions.
layout{
\context {
\type "Engraver_group"
\consists "Time_signature_engraver"
\consists "Axis_group_engraver"
\name "TimeSig"
\override TimeSignature #'font-size = #3
\override TimeSignature #'break-align-symbol = ##f
\override TimeSignature #'X-offset
= #ly:self-alignment-interface::x-aligned-on-self
\override TimeSignature #'self-alignment-X = #0
}
\context {
\Score \accepts TimeSig
}
\context {
\Staff
\remove "Time_signature_engraver"
}
}
timeSignatures = { \time 2/4 s2 \time 3/4 s2. \time 4/4 s1 }
\score {
<< \new TimeSig \timeSignatures
\new Staff \relative { c'2 c2. c1 }
\new Staff { a2 a2. a1}
>>
}
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
