ok, this sounds resonable, I just didn't understand the passage. So to
say: within a fifth means that it can be a second, third, and fourth,
but not a fifth.
Thanks for the explanations.
Till
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2007/5/12, Till Rettig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
while translating I found this sentence in the Docs Version 2.11.23
chapter
6.1.7:
What does the fifth do here? Wouldn't it be better to say: "inside
the same
octave" or something like this? It seems I don't understand this
passage.
Why is it suddenly a fifth and not a fourth anymore?
In French, we translated "within a fifth" by "moins d'une quinte"
("less than a fifth" in English) , which is maybe more easily
understandable...
Valentin Villenave
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
