Till Rettig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ok, this sounds resonable, I just didn't understand the passage. So to > say: within a fifth means that it can be a second, third, and fourth, > but not a fifth. > Thanks for the explanations.
If the meaning in question is `less than a fifth' then the English version should not say `within a fifth'. In English, `within' implies inclusivity if not explicitly modified. -- þ theron tlåx þ (compose-mail (concat "thorne@" (rot13 "gvzoeny") ".net")) _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
