Forwarded to bug-lilypond!

Is really the autopackage compiled against libc 2.3.4? If it should
work on "almost any Linux system", then it has to be compatible with
older versions of libc. On Debian stable, for example, libc has version
2.3.2.

   /Mats

Roland Goretzki wrote:
Hello list,,

I wrote:


Trying a little example with

 lilypond example-1.ly

results in an error message:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/noten/2.6.3.1/probe > lilypond example-1.ly GNU LilyPond 2.6.3.1
 [ ... ]
 /home/roland/.local/bin/lilypond-bin-2.6.3.1: relocation error:
 /home/roland/.local/lib/libguile.so.12: symbol regexec,
 version GLIBC_2.3.4 not defined in file
 libc.so.6 with link time reference

and creates only a .ps-file with 0 bytes.


well, that was with 2.6.3.1, and I've got no answer to this e-mail ...
:-(

Now, after succesfully installing 2.7.12 I got just the same error
message:

/home/roland/.local/bin/lilypond-bin-2.7.12: relocation error:
/home/roland/.local/lib/libguile.so.12: symbol regexec,
version GLIBC_2.3.4 not defined in file
libc.so.6 with link time reference

Who can help me?

Best Regards           Roland


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to