Hi Matthew, > The point isn't to list properties with no effect, but to list *all* of > the properties that *do* have an effect - not only those that happen to be > overridden at the most specific level of the hierarchy.
That was the first level of my requests dating back to 2016 (or maybe earlier?). > But one might well also ask, if there are useless properties with no > effect, then why are there useless properties with no effect, and isn't > the fact that such properties exist a much bigger problem than whether > they should be listed in the document? Well… implementing them might (read: almost certainly would) require a lot more time and effort than just listing them (which should be fully automatable!). But a listing would at least save frustration for us users who try to set some interface-inherited property that doesn’t actually do anything with the grob we’re working on. Best, Kieren. ______________________________________________ My work day may look different than your work day. Please do not feel obligated to read or respond to this email outside of your normal working hours.
