> Also, I’m sure you didn’t mean it that way, but the improvement to
> the LSR snippet is worthwile regardless, I think.
Yep.
> Going to greater lengths though—while reading your code I wondered
> whether it wouldn’t make sense to go the step of not taking strings
> as arguments (specifying the accidental glyphs) but either pitches
> or alterations (+1, -2…), especially if it’s supposed to work for
> MIDI. But that may well be of no use as a suggestion.
Well, the support stuff I wrote is specifically for `musicxml2ly`,
which uses pitches everywhere. Extending it should be possible, I
think.
Werner
