Hi Werner,
On 13.07.24 06:36, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I came across LSR #304https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=304 and I
think we should suggest a coding with variables there, like this:
[...]
Yes, LilyPond should be both more supportive and more 'user friendly'
here; this is tracked as
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6525
Another related issue […]
I’m impressed by all the work and thought you’ve put into this! It
overwhelmed me a bit, though, and I can’t really get in on the
development there, right now. Also, I’m sure you didn’t mean it that
way, but the improvement to the LSR snippet is worthwile regardless, I
think.
Going to greater lengths though—while reading your code I wondered
whether it wouldn’t make sense to go the step of not taking strings as
arguments (specifying the accidental glyphs) but either pitches or
alterations (+1, -2…), especially if it’s supposed to work for MIDI. But
that may well be of no use as a suggestion.
Best, Simon
