Hi Werner,

On 13.07.24 06:36, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I came across LSR #304https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=304  and I
think we should suggest a coding with variables there, like this:
[...]
Yes, LilyPond should be both more supportive and more 'user friendly'
here; this is tracked as

   https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6525

Another related issue […]

I’m impressed by all the work and thought you’ve put into this! It overwhelmed me a bit, though, and I can’t really get in on the development there, right now. Also, I’m sure you didn’t mean it that way, but the improvement to the LSR snippet is worthwile regardless, I think.

Going to greater lengths though—while reading your code I wondered whether it wouldn’t make sense to go the step of not taking strings as arguments (specifying the accidental glyphs) but either pitches or alterations (+1, -2…), especially if it’s supposed to work for MIDI. But that may well be of no use as a suggestion.

Best, Simon

Reply via email to