> Thank you for this. One question: is the second clef the size of a "change > clef" ? The reason I chose LSR 792 over 956 is the size of the second clef.
Yes. See for example
\relative c' {
%% Start with a bass clef :
\clef bass
%% Use a hidden grace note:
\once\hideNotes\grace c64
%% Adjust the clef spacing:
\once\override Staff.Clef.X-extent = #'(1 . 2)
%% Put in the treble clef:
\clef treble
c4 \clef bass c \clef treble c c | c1
}
This one does in fact create an actual clef, which is then of course a change
clef. But then it is fiddly (you need to adjust extent of the clef) and causes
the infamous start-on-grace issues. So I do think integrating this properly is
the way to go.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
