On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:16 AM Michael Werner <reznae...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 7:43 AM Kevin Cole <dc.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks. Not sure how I missed that in my search... That seems the best >> answer -- though, alas, the MIDI arpeggiator cannot take advantage of it. >> (I may be able to suss that out "the hard way" manually though.) >> > > Sorry, but MIDI is an area I know almost nothing about, as I almost never > use it. My main focus is hardcopy. Best I can come up with is to do > something a little like what is shown in > > >> MIDI arpeggiator: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2020-12/msg00036.html >> > > It would involve basically making a parallel version of your music that, > while not looking like what you want the printed output to look like, will > sound right (or close to it) once run through the MIDI system. > That's essentially the direction I've gone. (I already regularly split / duplicate the score into a print layout version and a MIDI version. It's just a matter of figuring out what, if anything, will sound "right" to my amateur ear.)
