Thanks to all for the clarification. Ken
On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 6:14 AM Sven Axelsson <sven.axels...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 at 09:03, Kenneth Wolcott <kennethwolc...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I have some LIlypond code (from someone on the list) which is at >> Lilypond version: >> >> grep version ./only_even_bars.ly >> \version "2.22.0" >> >> ~/Downloads/lilypond-2.24.1/bin/lilypond ./only_even_bars.ly >> GNU LilyPond 2.24.1 (running Guile 2.2) >> Processing `./only_even_bars.ly' >> Parsing... >> Interpreting music...[8] >> Preprocessing graphical objects... >> Finding the ideal number of pages... >> Fitting music on 1 page... >> Drawing systems... >> Converting to `only_even_bars.pdf'... >> Success: compilation successfully completed >> >> No big fat warning. >> >> ~/Downloads/lilypond-2.24.1/bin/lilypond --version >> GNU LilyPond 2.24.1 (running Guile 2.2) >> >> The resultant pdf is at Lilypond version 2.24.1 (attached). >> >> Hmmm... > > > The version number in the footer just shows what version of Lilypond you > compiled with. > It does not mean that your score was changed in any way, and if it contains > features that > have been changed or deprecated the compilation will still fail and you need > to run > convert-ly as usual. > > -- > Sven Axelsson > ++++++++++[>++++++++++>+++++++++++>++++++++++>++++++ > >++++<<<<<-]>++++.+.++++.>+++++.>+.<<-.>>+.>++++.<<. > +++.>-.<<++.>>----.<++.>>>++++++.<<<<.>>++++.<----.
