> Le 18 févr. 2023 à 08:31, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> a écrit : > >>> It prints a thick fat warning that the LilyPond version is too old >>> to handle this score. It proceeds, but it returns an non-zero >>> error code as a sign of protest :-) >> >> Ahem, no? There is only an additional warning in case the >> compilation is already failing. > > ? > > ``` > wl@linux:~> lilypond grace.ly > GNU LilyPond 2.25.2 (running Guile 2.2) > Processing `grace.ly' > Parsing... > error: program too old: 2.25.2 (file requires: 2.26) > Interpreting music... > Preprocessing graphical objects... > Finding the ideal number of pages... > Fitting music on 1 page... > Drawing systems... > Converting to `grace.pdf'... > fatal error: failed files: "grace.ly" > wl@linux:~> echo $? > 1 > ``` Well, that’s what you get if the LilyPond version is too old. The question was for a version that is “too new”.
