Hi Michael It just takes having to explain something to sort it. Those two problematic bars are now: which is much better. I still don't really like the tied quavers where a crotchet is rung, but then you can't have everything! The relevant code is:
g8 ~ <g b>8 <g c>8 ~ <g c d>8 <g e>4 <g d>4 | <e g c>8 ~ <d e g b>8 <e g c>8 ~ <f g c d>8 <e g c>4 <d g b>4 | for the accompaniment. Thanks for making me think! Martin On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 20:39 +0000, J Martin Rushton wrote: > Hi Michael > I've mocked up the same two bars in LibreOffice as tablature: > > > Where you see a dot and a number, the dot indicates half a beat's > rest, so that row three of the first beat is interpreted as r8 > b8 In the second bar, first beat, the "5 6" is c8 b8 The bolded > top row indicates the tune, which typically needs to be run a little > harder whilst the lower bells ring softer. The problem comes with > setting, for instance, the first beat. I tried using things like > << \relative c' {\stemDown g'4 <g c>4 g4 <g f>4 } \\ \relative c' { > s8 b'8 s8 d8 e4 d4 } >> | << \relative c' { <g' e>4 <c g>4 } \\ > \relative c' \autoBeamOff { c'8 <b d,>8 e,8 <d' f,>8 } >> <c' g e>4 > <b g d>4 | > for the accompaniment but it is horrible and confused. I've a > feeling that need to change the g'4 in the first beat to g'8 ~ g8 to > keep all the stems together. I'll report back after testing. > I hope that that clarifies things a little, > Martin > On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 13:14 -0500, Michael Werner wrote: > > Hi Martin. > > Well, I'm still pretty new to Lilypond but I have done some > > handbell music. I don't play them myself - my mother is the > > musician while I'm her tech support, I guess would be the way to > > phrase it. My approach with the more complex pieces her group was > > doing was to generate a somewhat simplified version just for her. I > > would make sure to retain enough of the main melody line that she > > could follow it, while cutting out anything else I could. Of course > > I had to make sure to leave in the notes that she was responsible > > for. Wouldn't work too well without them. Also I would put a larger > > callout symbol above each note she rings to help her see them - > > she's pushing 80 years old and her eyesight is going. While I was > > at it, I would also produce a complete version. But that was mainly > > just me playing around and gaining some experience. > > > > A lot of that was made a bit easier by just carving up the piece in > > multiple voices, with each voice going into a variable. Then I > > could assemble the appropriate piece of music by just calling the > > variables I needed for that particular version. Lots of > > possibilities to redo entire scores without having to retype a > > whole bunch of music. > > > > As for handbell tablature I've never seen it. None of the handbell > > music she has brought home for me to play with has had any > > tablature, just the "normal" music. Tablature for a few other > > instruments, yes, but not handbells. > > > > Well, this was kind of rambling - sorry about that. Like I said I'm > > still kinda new to Lilypond. It's been an interesting journey so > > far, with still quite a long ways to go. Still trying to get a > > decent grasp on the whole Scheme thing. Oh well. Just gotta keep > > trying, I guess. Hope maybe something in all this might have helped > > maybe a bit. > > > > Michael > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 12:46 PM J Martin Rushton < > > martinrushto...@btinternet.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Our handbell team rings some pieces from normal scores, and some > > > from a tablature notation. I had a go at converting one of our > > > favourite pieces from tablature to scores, but some of the bars > > > become so complex that I'm not sure this helps at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone else done handbells on Lilypond? As a supplementary > > > question, does anyone know of any software that can generate > > > handbell tablatures? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Martin > > > > > > -- > > > J Martin Rushton MBCS -- J Martin Rushton MBCS -- J Martin Rushton MBCS