Hi Joel,
Am 11.11.22 um 15:37 schrieb Joel C. Salomon:
But if that can be done from a Scheme function, it’s probably
sufficient; no need to tamper with Lilypond grammar.
To use Lucas’s example:
[which was wrong, as I forgot the tied notes, sigh - but that doesn't
matter.]
r8 es2.-8 f2 ges8~
8 as2.-8 8
can
r8 es \duration_subtract{2.}{8} f2 …
be made to work? (With whatever syntax.)
This seems to be difficult, as it seems a scheme function returning a
duration is not accepted in this position:
\version "2.23.5"
test = #
(define-scheme-function () ()
(ly:make-duration 1 1))
{
c'\test
}
% this works:
{
c' $(test)
}
Which is a pity since this makes for a much less convenient syntax: It
would look something like
c' $(duration_substract #{ 2. #} #{ 8 #})
As far as I know there's no LilyPond syntax equivalent to $(...) for a
LilyPond scheme function...?
Lukas
