Freeman Gilmore <freeman.gilm...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 7:58 PM David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Freeman Gilmore <freeman.gilm...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Is there going to be a non binary version for windows coming soon? >> >> The source code is the same independent of operating system, so you >> apparently don't mean "source code" when you say "non binary". What >> would your expectations of a "non binary version for windows" be? >> > Ok i see it now, but this was my problem. I know that the source code > (binary) is usually the same for all but I have never worked with > source code for LilyPond so when I read this, "Documentation writers > and testers will generally want to download the latest binary:" with 5 > binaries listed below, *Note, the colon should be a period;* and make > it look like it is not the header for a listing. I may not b the only > dummy out there!.
I don't understand what you are saying here and you write things like "source code (binary)" that make pretty clear that we are still talking about entirely different things. So I repeat my question: what would your expectations of a "non binary version for windows" be? -- David Kastrup
