On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 7:58 PM David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Freeman Gilmore <freeman.gilm...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 3:50 PM David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.8. This is termed > >> a development release, but these are usually reliable. If you want to > >> use the current stable version of LilyPond, we recommend using the > >> 2.22.2 version. > >> > >> In this release, dropping Guile 1.8 support has finally become possible > >> also for our sources. We'd like to dedicate this release to Ian Hulin > >> who was one of the first systematically working on our numerous > >> roadblocks for Guile 2 migration after tackling a few other high-level > >> problems. In the time spans where his health permitted it, he was able > >> to significantly reduce the amount of remaining problems for the Guile 2 > >> migration after having started working on them in 2010, making the goal > >> that we finally reached now more tangible for others to work on after he > >> left us in 2015. > >> > >> -- > >> David Kastrup > >> > > > > Is there going to be a non binary version for windows coming soon? > > The source code is the same independent of operating system, so you > apparently don't mean "source code" when you say "non binary". What > would your expectations of a "non binary version for windows" be? > > -- > David Kastrup > Ok i see it now, but this was my problem. I know that the source code (binary) is usually the same for all but I have never worked with source code for LilyPond so when I read this, "Documentation writers and testers will generally want to download the latest binary:" with 5 binaries listed below, *Note, the colon should be a period;* and make it look like it is not the header for a listing. I may not b the only dummy out there!. Thank you, ƒg
