Lilypond has a very characteristic G-Clef. I’ve only seen a handful of Bärenreiter scores with a similar clef.
I personally find the Lilypond-Clef beautiful, but quite some people find it a bit too characteristic. I think part of this could come from the Clef being very straight. In most editions the G-Clef has a slant forward, so that the right edge is less leaning backward. So I’ve simply tried to rotate the clef a bit, and I’ve found that with just a slight rotation the clef looks much more like a „standard” G-clef. So what do you think about this? Could it be that the G-clef of Feta is just slightly too straight? Cheers, Valentin
\version "2.22" slClef = { \override Clef.stencil = #(lambda (grob) (let* ((glyph (ly:grob-property grob 'glyph-name))) (cond ((equal? glyph "clefs.G") (ly:stencil-translate (ly:stencil-rotate (ly:clef::print grob) -1.5 0 -2) '(-0.06 . 0))) ((equal? glyph "clefs.G_change") (ly:stencil-rotate (ly:clef::print grob) -2 0 0)) (else (ly:clef::print grob))))) } slClefII = { \override Clef.stencil = #(lambda (grob) (let* ((glyph (ly:grob-property grob 'glyph-name))) (cond ((equal? glyph "clefs.G") (ly:stencil-translate (ly:stencil-rotate (ly:clef::print grob) -2.5 0 -1.5) '(-0.06 . 0))) ((equal? glyph "clefs.G_change") (ly:stencil-rotate (ly:clef::print grob) -2.8 0 0)) (else (ly:clef::print grob))))) } mI = << \new Staff { \key c\major \grace {\once\hideNotes c64} c''2 e''4 g'' } \new Staff {\clef bass \key c\major \grace {\once\hideNotes c64} \once\override Staff.Clef.X-extent = #'(1.5 . 2) \clef "treble" c'8 g' e' g' c' g' e' g' } >> << \new PianoStaff \mI \new PianoStaff \with {\slClef } \mI \new PianoStaff \with {\slClefII } \mI >> << \new PianoStaff \transpose c cis \mI \new PianoStaff \with {\slClef } \transpose c cis \mI \new PianoStaff \with {\slClefII } \transpose c cis \mI >>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.