Marnen Laibow-Koser <mar...@marnen.org> writes: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 6:49 AM David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Marnen Laibow-Koser <mar...@marnen.org> writes: > > [...] > >> >> >> > AFAIK this was never proper syntax to begin with. Does it compile with >> > LilyPond 2.18? I'd be surprised if it does. >> >> It was prior to 2.18, and it was merely discouraged with 2.18 (in the >> course of which all occurences got replaced). There were good reasons >> for retiring the syntax for good, but they were not accompanied by a >> suitable convert-ly rule. > > > Huh, that’s odd, but good to know. > > >> >> So basically the complaint is valid. > > > But it sounds like this is an omission (I’d say a bug) in convert-ly > itself, not necessarily an indication that this build of it is broken, > right?
Right. -- David Kastrup
