Werner LEMBERG wrote > Interesting. Is it documented somewhere that the order of `\consists` > calls is relevant (sometimes)?
Hi Werner, I couldn't find anything about that in the documentation. When experimenting with Voice and TabVoice, I noticed that Voice worked without a problem and, most notably, the fingering routines were called before the script routines. In *ly/engraver-init.ly*, the Voice context definition contains a comment: […] \consists "Auto_beam_engraver" \consists "Grace_auto_beam_engraver" %% must come before Script_column_engraver. \consists "New_fingering_engraver" \consists "Chord_tremolo_engraver" \consists "Double_percent_repeat_engraver" […] TabVoice, finally, is based on Voice but with New_fingerning_engraver removed (but Script_column_engraver still being there). When appending it again by using "\consists…", the order is messed up. Werner LEMBERG wrote > Or maybe there is a bug somewhere? I think not having to think about > the order would be quite beneficial. I totally agree there, but the New_fingering_engraver has been designed that way and it's complicated enough. It'd be great of course if someone had a good idea how to get rid of these dependencies. Regards, Torsten -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
