> On 26 Apr 2019, at 00:49, Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > But the OP was not requiring a multiuser development environment, but a > multi-device one.
Indeed - but no harm in looking at other possibilities if planning a request for changes in Frescobaldi. > For multiple users on one project surely you would use git nowadays, on > github or your own server, pretty much the universal answer (because it works > so well). Being an elderly and amateur single-user, I have limited experience of GitHub, but I take your point. > > The issue is about sharing _templates_ and _snippets_ not includes. I am > going to start on modifying F. to support that. Should not be difficult. It's > a logical request, and an idea that would not have been thought of before > cloud services became widely available. I can accept the idea that snippets should stand on their own feet and be complete in themselves, but I envisage a template as being larger — perhaps one of a family of similar entities. In this context it makes a lot of sense to use \include files for code which is common to all. In the event that a bug in such a code fragment is discovered, it doesn’t need to be fixed in every file of which it would necessarily be a part if you excluded the use of \includes. This happened to me recently when a change in Lilypond version made illegal a piece of code which I had previously got away with! > > Sure, you can load a file and 'save as'. But 'new from template' is currently > supported and a nice function. Absolutely right - I’ll be using it from now on now that I’ve “rediscovered” it! Michael _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user